Picture your last “hot lead”…
Now picture the group chat that lead was actually part of. The one where four other people quietly weighed in, argued about your pricing, compared you to the competition, and never once filled out a form.
Your CRM doesn’t know that group chat exists. And in B2B, especially in anything remotely enterprise, that group chat is usually where the deal actually gets decided.
Here’s the model most of us are still running, whether we admit it or not: One person → one form fill → one MQL → one handoff to sales.
Sure, it’s tidy and it’s easy to build a dashboard around. But really…. that is not how it works. Nobody buys alone anymore.
I will use enterprise healthcare as the example, but swap in whatever regulated, complicated, high-stakes, risk averse category you sell into and this holds up fine.
A real enterprise buying decision usually involves a CEO / COO / CMO, a CIO, a CFO, a VP of Ops, and a clinical or technical lead who all have very different questions and very different definitions of “risk.” They don’t show up to your website at the same time (if ever now given AEO). They don’t all fill out the same form. Some of them may never talk to you directly at all; they just get looped into a Slack or Teams thread with a screenshot of your pricing page and a strong opinion.
That thread is your real funnel. Your actual funnel, the one with stages and conversion rates, is just the small part of it that happened to leave a paper trail. Your “MQL” definition was built for a single magical buyer’s attribution journey. What you’re actually dealing with is an ensemble cast, coordinating mostly off the record, searching AI, and sending messages you never get to see.
Even better…the person who fills out the form is rarely the person who started the conversation. By the time someone from the buying committee fills out a form on your site, the internal group chat may have been up and running for weeks. The form fill isn’t the beginning of the journey. It’s a checkpoint somewhere in the middle, and often it’s the least senior person in the room doing the actual Googling on behalf of everyone else.
Your funnel reports that moment as the start of the story. But that is not the truth of the journey. It’s not lying on purpose, it just literally cannot see the part of the conversation that happened off-platform, which is most of it.
If your whole system is optimized to reward and measure that one visible moment, you’re optimizing for the least important signal in the whole process.
What to measure instead? Well, I’m not saying burn down your MQL. I’m saying stop pretending it’s the finish line, the ultimate goal, the magic “inbound” that happens in a vacuum…
What actually predicts a deal is:
- Multiple people from the same target account showing up, not just one
- Increasing seniority in who’s engaging over time
- Accumulating signals across channels, not one big splashy conversion event
- Real, qualified conversations, not just form fills
None of that fits neatly into a single lead score. It requires you to think and report in accounts, not individuals. Which, I’ll be honest, is more work. It’s also just… true. And I’d rather build a system around what’s true than one that’s easy to screenshot for the board or leadership team because it is tidy.
What is the reframe…? Stop asking “how many leads did we generate.” Start asking “how many of the right accounts had multiple people meaningfully engaged this quarter?”
One is a vanity number. The other is basically a leading indicator of whether you’re going to hit pipeline. Your funnel isn’t malicious. It’s just reporting on the one hallway it can actually see. The real decision is happening in a group chat down the corridor. “Lead” was always a placeholder word for something much messier and much more interesting: a group of humans, with competing priorities, slowly talking themselves into trusting you.
Stop trying to fix the funnel by obsessing over form fills. Start building for the group chat. The committee. The conversation. The relationship.
Meghan McParland builds and scales B2B marketing functions from the ground up, most recently rebuilding demand generation and ABM at a healthcare software company post-merger. She writes about marketing operations, AI-augmented teams, and building growth engines that don’t rely on more headcount.
Originally published on LinkedIn on July 27, 2026 → Read the original on LinkedIn
Leave a Reply